Best Read [Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer] ✓ Memory, History, Forgetting || [Philosophy Book] PDF ↠

By Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer | Comments: ( 716 ) | Date: ( Nov 14, 2019 )

Why do major historical events such as the Holocaust occupy the forefront of the collective consciousness, while profound moments such as the Armenian genocide, the McCarthy era, and France s role in North Africa stand distantly behind Is it possible that history overly remembers some events at the expense of others A landmark work in philosophy, Paul Ricoeur s Memory,Why do major historical events such as the Holocaust occupy the forefront of the collective consciousness, while profound moments such as the Armenian genocide, the McCarthy era, and France s role in North Africa stand distantly behind Is it possible that history overly remembers some events at the expense of others A landmark work in philosophy, Paul Ricoeur s Memory, History, Forgetting examines this reciprocal relationship between remembering and forgetting, showing how it affects both the perception of historical experience and the production of historical narrative.Memory, History, Forgetting, like its title, is divided into three major sections Ricoeur first takes a phenomenological approach to memory and mnemonical devices The underlying question here is how a memory of present can be of something absent, the past The second section addresses recent work by historians by reopening the question of the nature and truth of historical knowledge Ricoeur explores whether historians, who can write a history of memory, can truly break with all dependence on memory, including memories that resist representation The third and final section is a profound meditation on the necessity of forgetting as a condition for the possibility of remembering, and whether there can be something like happy forgetting in parallel to happy memory Throughout the book there are careful and close readings of the texts of Aristotle and Plato, of Descartes and Kant, and of Halbwachs and Pierre Nora.A momentous achievement in the career of one of the most significant philosophers of our age, Memory, History, Forgetting provides the crucial link between Ricoeur s Time and Narrative and Oneself as Another and his recent reflections on ethics and the problems of responsibility and representation His success in revealing the internal relations between recalling and forgetting, and how this dynamic becomes problematic in light of events once present but now past, will inspire academic dialogue and response but also holds great appeal to educated general readers in search of both method for and insight from considering the ethical ramifications of modern events It is indeed a master work, not only in Ricoeur s own vita but also in contemporary European philosophy Library Journal Ricoeur writes the best kind of philosophy critical, economical, and clear New York Times Book Review

  • Title: Memory, History, Forgetting
  • Author: Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer
  • ISBN: 9780226713427
  • Page: 345
  • Format: Paperback

About Author:

Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer

Paul Ricoeur 1913 2005 is widely recognized as one of the most distinguished philosophers of the twentieth century In the course of his long career he wrote on a broad range of issues His books include a multi volume project on the philosophy of the will Freedom and Nature The Voluntary and the Involuntary 1950, Eng tr 1966 , Fallible Man 1960, Eng tr 1967 , and The Symbolism of Evil 1960, Eng tr 1970 a major study of Freud Freud and Philosophy An Essay on Interpretation 1965, Eng tr 1970 The Rule of Metaphor 1975, Eng tr 1977 Interpretation Theory Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning 1976 the three volume Time and Narrative 1983 85, Eng tr 1984 88 Lectures on Ideology and Utopia 1986 the published version of his Gifford lectures Oneself as Another 1990, Eng tr 1992 Memory, History, Forgetting 2000, Eng tr 2004 and The Course of Recognition 2004, Eng tr 2005 In addition to his books, Ricoeur published than 500 essays, many of which appear in collections in English History and Truth 1955, Eng tr 1965 Husserl An Analysis of His Phenomenology 1967 The Conflict of Interpretations Essays in Hermeneutics 1969, Eng tr 1974 Political and Social Essays 1974 Essays on Biblical Interpretation 1980 Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences 1981 From Text to Action 1986, Eng tr 1991 Figuring the Sacred Religion, Narrative, and Imagination 1995 The Just 1995, Eng tr 2000 On Translation 2004, Eng tr 2004 and Reflections on the Just 2001, Eng tr 2007.The major theme that unites his writings is that of a philosophical anthropology This anthropology, which Ricoeur came to call an anthropology of the capable human being, aims to give an account of the fundamental capabilities and vulnerabilities that human beings display in the activities that make up their lives Though the accent is always on the possibility of understanding the self as an agent responsible for its actions, Ricoeur consistently rejects any claim that the self is immediately transparent to itself or fully master of itself Self knowledge only comes through our relation to the world and our life with and among others in that world.In the course of developing his anthropology, Ricoeur made a major methodological shift His writings prior to 1960 were in the tradition of existential phenomenology But during the 1960s Ricoeur concluded that properly to study human reality he had to combine phenomenological description with hermeneutic interpretation For this hermeneutic phenomenology, whatever is intelligible is accessible to us in and through language and all deployments of language call for interpretation Accordingly, there is no self understanding that is not mediated by signs, symbols, and texts in the final analysis self understanding coincides with the interpretation given to these mediating terms Oneself as Another, 15, translation corrected This hermeneutic or linguistic turn did not require him to disavow the basic results of his earlier investigations It did, however, lead him not only to revisit them but also to see clearly their implications.

Comments Memory, History, Forgetting

  • Jonathan

    Much more readable than I expected, particularly as we are dealing with phenomenological approaches to time, and very clearly structured and argued. Lots of end-notes, so the text itself is actually much shorter than the number of pages suggests. I agree with his fundamental concerns about the "unsettling spectacle offered by an excess of memory here, and an excess of forgetting elsewhere, to say nothing of the influence of commemorations and abuses of memory – and of forgetting" , though his [...]

  • أحمد شاكر

    هذا كتاب ضخم. كتاب غير عادي. أربعة أقسام، ليس كما يشير العنوان: الذاكرة، التاريخ، النسيان، الغفران. أصعبها وأطولها وأكثرها تعقيدا الجزء المتعلق بالتاريخ، وأجملها وأكثرها قربا للحياة والواقع الجزء المتعلق بالنسيان والغفران.طبعا، كان صعبا علي فهم بول ريكور، أو فهم الكتاب، فه [...]

  • Andrew

    Phenomenology is often very hard to read, and Ricoeur is no exception. But despite that, all of Ricoeur's observations seem wise and measured. This is dense, not because of obscurantist writing techniques, but because Ricoeur simply has a lot to say. Even when I disagree with him (especially some of his ideas about the historiographic process), I found myself respecting his arguments enough to continue onwards. I wish I had a greater grounding in Norbert Elias, Erving Goffman, and a few other pe [...]

  • David M

    Alright, this was my twelfth book by Paul Ricoeur this year, and now I'm seriously going to take a breakI find philosophy can be incredibly seductive. Fiction really falls by the wayside. I mean, why should I care about this little domestic snafu somewhere when I have the chance to stalk being itself?? So I tend to binge, and then it starts to feel like my brain's bleeding, and I wonder if I've really learned anything at all But then, months or even years later, I'll notice that I'm thinking abo [...]

  • Michelle Marvin

    I am so grateful that Ricoeur undertook this massive exploration of memory, history, forgetting, and forgiveness. I thoroughly enjoyed the first part, on memory, but found the second part on history much more difficult to follow. I am certain that if I were more acquainted with Husserl and Heidegger I would have been better prepared for this journey. This is the reason for the four stars - I unfortunately can't recommend the book unless you've done prior reading in Ricoeur (I came to the text ha [...]

  • عبدالله

    هذا العمل الضخم يُبين كم أن ريكور قارئ خرجت فلسفته من كل هذه النصوص التي شكّلت رؤيته .في أول فصول الكتاب الثلاثة كان ريكور جامدا بسبب إعتماده على الفينومينولوجيا الهوسرلية ما يستدعي عدم خروجه لعلوم أخرى غير الفلسفة، لكنه أصبح متوسعا لنصوص كثيرة يحلّلها (تأويليا) في فصل التار [...]

  • Carl

    I'm reading this as a supplement to the Cultural Memory reading I'm doing-- not sure how closely it will relate, or how much it will help with the problems of source criticism for ancient, oral religious beliefs which I am investigating, but I love Ricoeur, so I'll give it a go anyway! I suspect it would be best if I were to finish the Time and Narrative series first, but this book seems more directly relevant, so I'm going to see what I can get through for the time being. It's huge though. Not [...]

  • Okla Elliott

    About 100 pages in so far, and I'm thoroughly impressed. I'll update this review when I finish it and let you know if the next 500 pages live up to the first 100.[Update: It took me forever, but I finally finished the book. It is very strong in many regards, but I would not suggest it to even a highly educated general readership. This one is for specialists only. I had hoped to use it for my dissertation, which has a chapter on memory studies, but it ended up not proving useful for me.]

  • Marilena

    Serious mnemonic study with mainly a historical perspective. The style in which Ricoeur writes is difficult therefore it requires much attention andreadings.Anyway when it comes to memory, oblivion, anamnesis, history, this is a very important book.Hmmmo bad I don't have it in English!!!!!

  • María Eugenia

    "la autonomía del conocimiento histórico respecto al fenómeno mnemónico sigue siendo la presuposición principal de una epistemología coherente de la historia en cuanto disciplina científica yliteraria"Me dejó pensando

  • mahatma anto

    belum baca semua tapi udah ngasih ratingarinhabis, emang asyik sih bagian introductionnya.[haah? baru intro? lelet bangeet bacanya!]biarini kotak review kok nggak cerita tentang 'what i learned from this book'seeh?biarin

  • John

    Um incomprehensible. Only read the first section. The few ideas I was able to grasp, however, did seem pretty remarkable. Still's 500 pages on memory, and the overall argumentation is hard to follow.

  • Lisa Parisi

    This book changed my life. That's all I can say.

  • Chris Meyer

    Sort of a one-trick pony, but an insight to be sure.

  • Ngyw

    Thought provoking!

  • Katie Stafford

    I have hopes for this one! Perhaps the fact that it is a dense 600 page philosophical text in translation makes me optimistically dream that it will be worth it. I will let you know.

  • morning Os

    Dense. It surely makes you wonder if it is worth spending time reading this book instead of reading others. But you'll feel his passion.

  • Courtney

    It was interesting, insightful, and I enjoyed it. BUT it was as dense as a brick.

  • 5greenway

    Extraordinarily rich. I felt not nearly clever or well-read enough to make the most of this in one reading. Written with precision and warmth.

  • Joe Torchedlo

    phenomenology, philosophy, history, hermeneutics

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
  • Best Read [Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer] ✓ Memory, History, Forgetting || [Philosophy Book] PDF ↠
    345 Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer
  • thumbnail Title: Best Read [Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer] ✓ Memory, History, Forgetting || [Philosophy Book] PDF ↠
    Posted by:Paul Ricœur Kathleen Blamey David Pellauer
    Published :2019-08-08T05:58:55+00:00